A recent study has uncovered significant obstacles faced by eco-conscious consumers due to geographical limitations in clothing return schemes, despite the growing trend of fashion brands promoting green initiatives. The research highlights that while many companies are adopting circular economy policies—such as recycling and mending services—their effectiveness is often hampered by the customer’s location.
The study, conducted by the University of Birmingham in collaboration with the University of Bristol and American institutions including the University of Georgia and Buffalo State University, focuses on the impact of geography on circular economy initiatives in the activewear sector. The findings, published in the Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, underscore that location significantly influences the success of these ‘Waste Reduction Networks’.
The fashion industry is notorious for its environmental impact, with fast fashion contributing heavily to waste. According to the European Parliament, fewer than half of used clothes are collected for reuse or recycling, and only 1% are recycled into new garments. In response to growing environmental awareness, some companies have introduced measures to extend the life of clothing, such as repair services and trade-in schemes.
Professor John Bryson from the University of Birmingham noted, “Activewear is rapidly expanding as consumers become more health-conscious. Many brands promote an environmental ethos, encouraging a closer connection with nature, which is reflected in their advertising.”
The study analyzed 17 eco-friendly activewear companies across Europe and the US with circular economy policies. Researchers found that while companies like éclipse, Filippa K, and Girlfriend Collective offer return schemes aligned with sustainability principles, these services are largely available only to domestic customers. Professor Vida Vanchan remarked, “It is impractical for a customer in the UK to send items to Colorado due to the environmental impact. These Waste Reduction Networks are effective primarily for those who can access them easily.”
The research highlights that many companies, despite their international sales, have Waste Reduction Networks that operate only on a local, regional, or national level. This limitation is even more pronounced with mending services; for instance, Veja offers repairs only in specific locations despite its global presence.
Professor Bryson concluded, “While activewear companies are making commendable efforts to reduce their environmental impact, the consumer Waste Reduction Networks they offer are severely limited by geography. Despite their international reach, these networks operate mostly on a local or national scale.”
To address these challenges, the study suggests that companies should consider partnering with platforms like eBay, Vinted, or Depop, which are popular among eco-conscious consumers. Additionally, government support for waste management systems could help ensure more clothing is recycled instead of ending up in landfills, thereby scaling these initiatives to better address the environmental issues associated with clothing waste.
Related topics:
